Search form
Accessibility Navigation

McDougall Polach and J. Thanks for supporting Amazing Discoveries by using our products and services. There are new data protection laws taking place starting on May 25, that affect users from the European Union. If you are outside of the EU these new data laws do not affect you.

Recommended Posts

Due to these new laws, we are updating our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. To learn more about these new regulations, please visit this website about data protection: We may require additional consent from you when visiting certain parts of our website. By using our services on or after May 25, , you will be agreeing to these updates.

Thank you for understanding as we comply with these new EU regulations. We always seek to use your data responsibly. A form of carbon found in organic materials and the basis of the carbon dating method. It seems your browser is out of date.


  1. Recommended for you.
  2. how to not pay for dating websites!
  3. dating dubai man.
  4. You are here;
  5. top ten free dating sites 2015.
  6. Research illuminates inaccuracies in radiocarbon dating.

Please update your browser to view this webpage properly. Click here for more information. Radiometric dating is a technique used to date materials using known decay rates. Are radiometric dating methods accurate? A Basis for Conflict Downloadable 84kB.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Help us reduce the maintenance cost of our online services. Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites. You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.

We thank you in advance for partnering with us in this small but significant way. All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: Rate of Decay It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time.

Is Carbon Dating Accurate?

A Basis for Conflict. Is there evidence for Creation science? How does it compare to evolution? The following articles give insight in to these questions and more. Can we understand the age of the earth by the rocks? What theory does the evidence support? Soft Rock Evidence for Rapid Washout. What does the fossil record show us? Is it all random or a defined science that we can understand?

Where does evolution fit?

Uncover mysteries in the history of the Earth. As we study the genome, the molecule, and the atom, we see a vast network of intricate systems beyond our understanding. Were these systems really formed by chance? Is the Gastraea Hypothesis Viable? How did this world change from the perfection depicted in Genesis to a world full of thorns, thistles, parasites, and death?

If God made everything perfect, how could it have all been so changed? Archaeology and the Bible. Archaeology and prophecy have proven the Bible to be true. But what's so special about the Bible that makes it a point of so much controversy? Music is a powerful emotional motivator that crosses cultural and language barriers. Its message can be understood by every culture and people across the planet. The Bible and Rock Music: The Rock Industry Condemns Itself.

Hollywood and the Movies. What is the system of worship found most often in our society?

Does it glorify God? Brain Closed—Please Come Again. Is your brain hibernating? The Dangers of Television. Beware of the television's abilities to hypnotize, alter moods, and even cause depression. Violence and Video Games. Like music and movies, video games are addictive and can cause behavioral problems. The Origins of Halloween. What is the origin behind this popular festival celebrated every October 31? Introduction to the Reformation.

What started the Protestant Reformation? Was the Reformation a success? Does it still matter today? The Pope Claims to be God on Earth. Read proof that throughout the Roman Church's history, the Papacy has often claimed that the Pope is divine. The oppression of Protestants is widespread and consistent throughout history. It was once written in America's oldest Catholic newspaper, the Boston Pilot , that "No good government can exist without religion, and there can be no religion without an Inquisition, which is wisely designed for the promotion and protection of the true faith.

What happened at the Council of Trent?

Radiocarbon Dating

Learn what people throughout history have had to say on the reputation , history , and political nature of the Jesuit Order. This book "Cross and Crown" is a powerful and thrilling recital of the most romantic and dramatic incidents in history to be found on record, told in the simplest, most graphic, and entertaining form. The Aggressive Intentions of the Papacy.

The historian Ranke says this about Protestant-Catholic relations: The Catholic party appears to have felt itself the superior.

Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating

This tree rarely produces even a trace of an extra ring; on the contrary, a typical bristlecone pine has up to 5 percent of its rings missing. Concerning the sequence of rings derived from the bristlecone pine, Ferguson says:. In certain species of conifers, especially those at lower elevations or in southern latitudes, one season's growth increment may be composed of two or more flushes of growth, each of which may strongly resemble an annual ring. In the growth-ring analyses of approximately one thousand trees in the White Mountains, we have, in fact, found no more than three or four occurrences of even incipient multiple growth layers.

In years of severe drought, a bristlecone pine may fail to grow a complete ring all the way around its perimeter; we may find the ring if we bore into the tree from one angle, but not from another. Hence at least some of the missing rings can be found.

Is Carbon-Dating Accurate? | Radiometric dating | Rate of Decay | Clock Reset | Closed System

Even so, the missing rings are a far more serious problem than any double rings. Other species of trees corroborate the work that Ferguson did with bristlecone pines. Before his work, the tree-ring sequence of the sequoias had been worked out back to BC. The archaeological ring sequence had been worked out back to 59 BC. The limber pine sequence had been worked out back to 25 BC. The radiocarbon dates and tree-ring dates of these other trees agree with those Ferguson got from the bristlecone pine. But even if he had had no other trees with which to work except the bristlecone pines, that evidence alone would have allowed him to determine the tree-ring chronology back to BC.

See Renfrew for more details. So, creationists who complain about double rings in their attempts to disprove C dating are actually grasping at straws. If the Flood of Noah occurred around BC, as some creationists claim, then all the bristlecone pines would have to be less than five thousand years old. This would mean that eighty-two hundred years worth of tree rings had to form in five thousand years, which would mean that one-third of all the bristlecone pine rings would have to be extra rings.

Creationists are forced into accepting such outlandish conclusions as these in order to jam the facts of nature into the time frame upon which their "scientific" creation model is based. Barnes has claimed that the earth's magnetic field is decaying exponentially with a half-life of fourteen hundred years. Not only does he consider this proof that the earth can be no older than ten thousand years but he also points out that a greater magnetic strength in the past would reduce C dates.

Now if the magnetic field several thousand years ago was indeed many times stronger than it is today, there would have been less cosmic radiation entering the atmosphere back then and less C would have been produced. Therefore, any C dates taken from objects of that time period would be too high. How do you answer him? Like Cook, Barnes looks at only part of the evidence.